Page Last Updated: Wednesday, 04 November 2015 13:35 EDT, © 1964, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
An Historical SurveyDean S. Hartley, Jr., President Nanka Token Kai Fred Martin and Bob Haynes, Exhibition Co-Chairmen Co-Sponsored by the Municipal Art Patrons of Los Angeles and the Southern California To-Ken Kai Municipal Art Gallery, Barnsdall Park February 19th Through March 22nd, 1964
|
|
|
Dean Hartley |
Fred Martin |
Bob Haynes |
|
|
Willis Hawley & Hartley |
|
|
Mr. Taromatsu Okano & a Dai-Sho of fabulous mounts to a pair of fabulous swords, both by Sukehiro. |
|
|
Bob Wainwright, Dean Hartley, Charles Cowdery, & Willis Hawley |
|
||
|
The show in progress |
Cover: Painting by Walther G. von Krenner |
Kofun Bunka Period
Heian Period (794 -
1185 A.D.)
Kamakura Period
(1185 - 1333)
Yoshino Period (1333
- 1392)
Muromachi Period
(1392 - 1596)
Edo Period (1596 - 1868)
Tsuba
Prior to 1400
Swordsmith (Tosho) Tsuba
Armorsmith
(Katchushi) Tsuba
Satome (Armorer) School
Tempo Tsuba
Kamakura (Style) Tsuba
Onin (Style of
Brass Inlay) Tsuba
Heianjo (Kyoto
Brass Inlay) Tsuba
Other Brass Inlay
Schools
Heianjo (Kyoto
Openwork) Tsuba
Kyo-Sukashi (Kyoto Openwork) and Daigoro Schools
Kaneiye (Style) Tsuba
Nobuiye (Style) Tsuba
Myochin (Armorer) Tsuba
Yamakichibei (School)
Tsuba
Owari (Openwork) Tsuba
Hoan (Family) Tsuba
Other Owari Schools
Nara Kaji (Nara
Smiths) School
Kanayama (Style) Tsuba
Yagyu School Style
Kagami-Shi
(Mirror Makers) Tsuba
Tachikanagu-Shi (Tachi Fittings Maker) Tsuba
Ko-Kinko
(Old Decorative Style) Tsuba
Goto School Tsuba
Mito Area Masters
Tsuchiya Yasuchika
and School
Ko-Nara (Style) Tsuba
Hamano School
Umetada School
Shoami Schools
Akasaka School
Kinai School
Hirata Hikozo
Hayashi Matashichi
Nishigaki School
Jingo School
Kamiyoshi Family
Other Higo Schools
Ko-Hagi Style Tsuba
Choshu Tsuba Schools
Sendai Tsuba
Suruga Armor School
Shonai School
Various Artists and Schools
Soten (Style) Tsuba
Sahari Inlay Style Tsuba
Hirata
Cloisonné Tsuba
Namban Style Tsuba
Kinko Style Tsuba
Mislabeled Illustrations
Types of
Swords
Sori (Curve)
Mei (Signature)
Nakago and
Nakago Tip (Jiri) Shapes
Blade Shapes
Boshi Shapes
(Hamon at Tip of Blade)
Hada (Skin) Patterns
Hamon Shapes
Vocabulary
In Japan the sword and its associated fittings have for centuries been regarded as an expression of the highest art, worthy of the consideration of an Emperor and, in fact during the early thirteenth century, the Emperor Go-Toba participated in the creation of masterpieces which approach the zenith of sword excellence. The west has commonly regarded them as curiosities, the products of a craft, and equated them with other swords. It is the hope of the Southern California To-Ken Kai that this exhibit may in some measure contribute to a better understanding of the Japanese sword and a more correct evaluation of its artistic values.
The descriptive terminology in this catalogue is the language of the sword and recourse to the glossary of terms will, for the uninitiated, be absolutely necessary. From very early times expertise on the sword was the exclusive property of families of sword experts, principally the Honami, who maintained their knowledge as a closely guarded secret. Thus, the language was intended to obscure rather than reveal. Further, the idiom is one which does not lend itself to easy translation, there being no equivalent terms in the English language.
Chronology is arbitrary since there is no close agreement even among historians. The chronological divisions are in the main political, the single exception being connected with sword history. Most divisions in sword history coincide with political divisions, there being a strong interconnection between the two.
It is to be regretted that all of the material exhibited could not be included in the catalogue. Examples were chosen not only on the basis of quality but as specimens representative of a particular time and school. Selection was made from an aggregate total of over two hundred swords and seven hundred tsuba exhibited.
The study and collection of the Japanese sword and its fittings is attracting a growing list of followers from widely assorted backgrounds. Their common interest is an appreciation of the unique skills and creative talents which rank the master swordsmith and the ciseleur with the enduring artists of this and future times. Their rights to such distinction are evident in the pieces chosen for display in this exhibit. Many are rare examples, many are seldom seen masterpieces ... all are fine examples of the art.
Our deep appreciation is extended to those institutions and individuals who so generously made their collections available to us, to the people without whose unselfish aid this achievement could never have been, and to the Los Angeles Municipal Art Patrons for their unremitting support of our hopeful effort.
F.C.M.
Editor's note: The actual catalog contains the Japanese characters for the smiths' signatures, which are not reproduced here. Also, some of the pages have been rearranged to take advantage of the web format versus the page format of the original catalog.
1.
Standing figure of a warrior in full armor, |
2. Armor: red laced Oyoroi (great harness) of the Edo period in an early style. |
Armor on display at the exhibit.
|
||
Color photo of Figure 2 above |
||
|
Preserved within the confines of Todaiji temple in Nara is an ancient storehouse founded in 756 A.D. as a memorial to the Emperor Shomu. In this relatively fragile structure all of the Emperor's personal possessions, together with gifts of the court, have remained inviolate to this day. Included among the treasures dedicated were swords, armor of plate and scale, bows, arrows, pole arms of several types, and other military equipment. During the Oshikatsu rebellion in 764 A.D. the weapons were removed to the palace by imperial command and much was lost in the subsequent fighting. The precious remainder serve as the principal source of information about the weapons of the period. Among the rest, forty nine long swords were left, their blades bright and shining today. These swords exhibit every important characteristic found at the culmination of the swordsmiths' art five centuries later. Although the sword underwent modifications during the succeeding centuries, the shape and underlying principle remained the same. Thus, old swords remained serviceable until the last and were carefully preserved, both for their utility and because of the deep reverence which the Japanese feel for the blade.
All swordsmiths, regardless of the place or time, have been confronted with the problem of creating a blade which would neither bend nor break and yet would cut well. The unique Japanese solution to this problem was the development of what may be called a composite blade. The basic principle of the Japanese sword is the support of an extremely hard edge steel by means of a tough resilient back. This was achieved by enclosing the edge steel in a mild steel back, by wrapping a mild steel core with edge steel, or by complicated constructions utilizing appropriate steels.
Traditionally, Japanese swords are classified into five schools or methods named after the province in which they originated: the Yamato, Yamashiro, Bizen, Soshu, and Mino, listed in the order of their historical appearance. They were, simply, different paths to the same goal differing only in technique. The basic principles were identical. All Japanese swords are composed of steels which were forged, folded, and reforged a number of times consistent with their utility, edge steels fifteen to twenty times and the milder steels six to eight times. Sometimes during the folding the grain of the steel was crossed. Heat treatment was accomplished by coating the blade with refractory clay which was thinner at the edge, bringing to heat, then quenching in water. The area at the edge, having less insulation, cooled rapidly and became hard. The back, covered with thicker clay, cooled slowly and became tough. At the same time the differential cross-sectional thickness in the blade caused it to assume a curve.
The spectacular polish found on Japanese swords not only enhances their beauty by making visible the tempered edge pattern and the details of forging which are so important to an aesthetic appreciation, but makes possible a visual evaluation of the essential qualities of the sword. If the grain created in the forging process is small and the heat before quenching high, as can be determined by the presence of a wide tempered edge and coarse nie (mirror-like particles of Martensite), the blade will be brittle. Conversely, if the grain is large and the tempered edge narrow and composed of nioi (cloud-like Martensite) then the blade will be soft. All of the elements involved in the making of the sword must be compatible, the grain of the steel, the temperature of the water, the thickness of the clay, and the heat. An infinite number of correct combinations are possible. Steel, the fabric of which the sword is composed, possesses important values of its own entirely separate from other considerations. It may be translucent deep and clear, a thing of transcendent beauty, or coarse, hard and dry, a product of haste and opportunity. Here the work of the smith stands most clearly revealed and his work defined.
The Japanese, as a people, are unique in their awareness of beauty. The society is permeated with this consciousness and there is a constant preoccupation with the aesthetic. Blades can be expected to reflect this sensitivity. The first consideration in the judgment of a sword is the shape: regardless of the period and the changing styles, it must be aesthetically satisfying. Swords made during the Heian period, with its strong overtones of effeminacy, and those made during the virile masculine Kamakura period were and are subject to the same rigorous aesthetic canons, although their shapes may be vastly different. Swords lacking form and style, such as those mass produced during the latter half of the Muromachi period for common use, are passed over by the discriminating collector. Similarly, the phenomena seen in the surface of the steel must be in taste. Pictorial representations in the hamon found during the Genroku era are considered to be merely examples of a limited virtuosity and lack depth and sincerity. The collector must differentiate between swords which are kept as representative of a type and those which are worthy of an aesthetic appreciation.
Although swords disappeared from daily use in 1877 with the promulgation of the Haitorei edict which prohibited their wear, some few smiths continued to work and, binding the present to the past, blades are being made today in accord with the highest traditions of this ancient art.
Frederick C. Martin
Swords on display at the exhibit, beginning with stages in the creation of a sword.
The era from the fourth century B.C. to the seventh century A.D. is called the Kofun Bunka period from the method of interment of the chiefs and important people of that era in stone crypts, or dolmens, which were located in burial mounds. Encircling the mound and the moats which sometimes surround the tomb are rows of fired clay cylinders the purpose of which is not known. They are called "haniwa" which means "circle of clay." At the crests of the mounds are found clay figures called "tsuchi ningyo" which represent retainers formerly immolated upon the death of their lord. Aside from their obvious aesthetic value, these figures are chiefly valuable for the information derived from them concerning the dress and habits of the people of those remote times.
The most important objects found within the tombs are iron swords. There are several types differentiated mainly by variations in the form of the pommel and the haft. All have single edged blades, the backs of which are straight. the mounts of these swords are generally copper richly gilded and often with patterns in repousse. The tsuba are of copper covered with sheet gold, iron with inlayed decoration, or simple iron. Most have pierced trapezoidal openings. With the swords are found iron plate armor of an advanced conception, horse trappings, bows, arrows with complex points, and other warlike paraphernalia as well as many objects of a more domestic utility. All bear witness to a sophisticated culture highly advanced technically and artistically.
TSUCHI NINGYO Standing figure of a warrior in full armor (illustration above). Differing from most figures of the period, the armor is conventionalized and lacks detailing. It conveys a most spruce and elegant feeling. Found near Fujioka in Gumma prefecture.
KEITO TACHI (not illustrated)
Circa 6th century A.D.
Over-all length of 43.5 inches;
blade length 31.6 inches;
the mounts are undecorated gilt copper, very rich feeling;
lozenge shaped tsuba with round and slightly raised edge;
haft secured by three heavy rivets;
the blade is wide, long, heavy, and typically straight and single edged.
KABUTSUCHI TACHI
Circa 6th century A.D.
Over-all length of 34.6 inches;
blade length 25.5 inches;
the mounts are of gilt copper, the haft decorated with a repousse wave pattern;
pommel typically bulbous and set obliquely;
tsuba of unperforated hoju form, very thin with round raised edge;
haft secured by two rivets;
the blade is straight and single edged.
This form is the 'mallet-headed' sword mentioned in ancient literature.
KOMA TSURUGI
Circa 6th century A.D.
Over-all length of 31 inches;
blade length 23.9 inches;
the mounts of gilt copper; haft decorated with bosses in repousse;
pommel enclosing the head of a phoenix holding a jewel;
tsuba is of hoju shape with six trapezoidal openings, very thin with raised edge;
haft is apparently secured by jamming;
the blade is straight and single edged.
This form of mounting is traditionally supposed to have been derived from Korean models. The impression is of dainty functional elegance.
HOJU TSUBA (not illustrated) Circa 6th century A.D. Iron, much incrusted; hoju form with eight trapezoidal openings; width 3.1 inches; length 3.5 inches; thickness at edge .25 inches, at center .12 inches.
Kofun Bunka swords, figures 3 and 4 |
The formalizing of the shape and style of the Japanese sword which occurred during the early tenth century was followed by the emergence of the first schools, prominent among which were the Sanjo and Gojo of Yamashiro, the Mogusa of Mutsu, the Ohara of Hoki, the Naminohira of Satsuma, and the Ko-Bizen smiths. A certain ambivalence of style is very noticeable. There are the slender and exceedingly graceful blades that seem well suited to the court which may be contrasted with the heavier and more manly blades which smell of the battlefield. Towards the end of the era the Genpei wars between the Taira and the Minamoto clans created a demand for weapons which caused the appearance of more schools and stimulated the advancement of the art. Swords made before the advent of the Kamakura period (1185 A.D.) were made principally by the Yamashiro method, although the Yamato was the first in order of historical appearance.
TANTO
Signed Amakuni.
Date early Heian;
Length of 7.7 inches;
Shape of a ken;
Hamon is hoso suguba with some nijuba;
Jihada is masame with yubashiri and some ji-nie, texture of the steel is very fine;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Traditionally, the earliest signatures found on swords is the legendary 'Amakuni of Yamato.' His blades are made in the earliest of five methods to appear historically, the Yamato. Accompanying letter by Honami Koson.
TACHI
Signed Bizen Kuni Tomonari saku.
Date mid-Heian;
Length of 28.2 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, wide and powerful blade, koshi zori;
Hamon is suguba ko-midare of nie, profuse small bright kinsuji in the ha-buchi, sunagashi, nie saki, strong activity in the ha;
Jihada is mokume itame mixed, some o-hada, ara nie in ha-buchi;
Jitetsu is zanguri, very homogeneous and beautiful;
Boshi is maru with some nijuba, a characteristic of Tomonari;
Nakago is suriage, signature strong and excellent;
Comments: This blade is made in the Yamashiro tradition, the second of five methods to appear historically. Ko-Bizen Tomonari is one of the greatest smiths in all of sword history. Accompanying origami by Honami Koju dated 1714. A masterpiece.
TACHI
Signed Bizen Kuni Kanehira saku.
Date mid-Heian;
Length of 29.2 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri koshi zori with utsumuku, ko-kissaki;
Hamon is suguba ko-midare of nie, inazuma, ha-hada, some sunagashi, strong activity;
Jihada is itame mokume mixed, o-hada;
Boshi is maru;
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: One of the famous ko-Bizen triumvirate, Kanehira, Sukehira, and Takahira, called the Sampira, or the Three Hira. This is a most important blade of National Treasure class. It is accompanied by an Honami origami dated 1780 and a certificate with the signature and seal of the Tokugawa Shogun.
TACHI
Signed Masatsune, cut out and inlayed (gaku mei).
Date mid-Heian;
Length of 31.3 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, slender with beautiful curvature;
Hamon is hoso suguba of nie, sprays of nie in the ha-buchi, slight irregularities;
Jihada is mokume itame mixed, ji-nie, very fine skin;
Boshi is maru, ko-kissaki;
Nakago is o-suriage;
Comments: This blade is a classic example of early slender tachi form by a first class ko-Bizen smith. It is accompanied by a document with the signature and seal of the 11th Tokugawa Shogun Ienari dated 1792 presenting the sword to Lord Mizuno and a document by Lord Mizuno describing the presentation.
TACHI
Signed Bungo Kuni no ju Yamanaka Yukihira saku.
Date 1057 (the usual date given for this smith is 1171);
Length of 30.7 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, strong koshi zori, ko-kissaki, utsumuku;
Hamon is suguha ko-midare of nie, kinsuji, inazuma;
Jihada is running itame;
Jitetsu is fine and dense, slight utsuri, few ji-nie;
Boshi is maru;
Nakago is ubu with strong sori;
Comments: Typical elegant, beautiful Heian form. Made in the Yamashiro tradition.
During the early part of the thirteenth century the ex-Emperor Go-Toba called the most prominent smiths in the country to Kyoto to work with him in the fashioning of swords. This unheard-of distinction initiated a golden era in sword history which lasted for approximately one hundred years. Never again was this zenith to be approached. The Shogun Yoritomo founded his camp-capitol at Kamakura, a small fishing village, in order to avoid the debilitating decadence of the court and set a fashion simple and manly. Even the court aped this mood. Two of the traditional five methods made their first appearance during this era. The Bizen method, founded during the early years by the ban-kaji Norimune and the Soshu method, which was founded during the latter part of the period by the Yamashiro Awataguchi smith Shintogo Kunimitsu who was followed by Yukimitsu and the great Masamune. Shifting centers of power caused the migration of smiths to new sources of patronage and many new families of smiths appeared. During the closing years, the wars between the followers of Ashikaga Takauji and the adherents of the Emperor Go-Daigo, whose headquarters were at Yoshino in the province of Yamato, caused the resuscitation of the practically defunct Yamato method. The great majority of swords now classed as national treasures or important art objects were made during the Kamakura period.
TANTO (not illustrated)
Signed Hisakuni.
Date late Heian to early Kamakura;
Length of 7.8 inches;
Shape ken form with thick diamond shaped cross section;
Hamon is hoso suguba of nie;
Jihada is ko-itame with no-nie;
Jitetsu is fine and dense;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Hisakuni was probably the most important of the smiths chosen by the Emperor Go-Toba (ban kaji). A member of the Awataguchi family who worked in the Yamashiro tradition. Accompanying letter by Honami Koson.
TACHI
Signed Sukehide, with 17 petal chrysanthemum.
Date early Kamakura;
Length of 26.9 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri with strong sori, high shinogi, fumbari;
Hamon is suguba ko-midare of mixed nie and nioi, ashi, kinsuji;
Jihada is mokume with some o-hada, yubashiri, ji-nie is typically fine and dense;
Boshi is hakkake with kaeri;
Nakago is slightly suriage;
Comments: Sukehide was the name used by the ex-Emperor Go-Toba while in exile on the island of Oki. He was accompanied in exile by six smiths who were called the Oki no Ban Kaji. Swords with his signature are exceedingly rare..
TACHI
Signed Kagehide.
Date early Kamakura;
Length of 27.4 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, koshi zori, fumbari, strongly curved;
Hamon is ko choji midare with kawazuko choji, profuse nie at the ha-buchi, ashi, yo, kinsuji;
Jihada is itame mokume mixed, zanguri;
Boshi is ko-maru;
Bo-hi on both sides;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Only one other signed blade by this smith is in existence, the national treasure 'Kurumbo Kiri' of the Date family. The form may be taken as definitive in its beauty. Kagehide was the younger brother of Mitsutada, founder of the early Osafune school of Bizen.
TACHI
Signed Norikuni.
Date early Kamakura;
Length of 27.5 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, tori zori;
Hamon is suguba with one area on the omote side below the mono-uchi of ko-midare, ha-buchi is mide with clear and luminous ko-nie, some nijuba;
Jihada is ko-itame, almost no ji-nie;
Jitetsu is very fine;
Boshi is ko-maru;
Bo-hi on both sides;
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: Awataguchi Norikuni of Yamashiro was one of the Emperor Go-Toba's selected smiths and an Oki no Ban Kaji. The son of Kunitomo.
TACHI
Signed Noritsugu.
Date early Kamakura;
Length of 26.6 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, tori zori, slight fumbari;
Hamon is suguba ko-choji midare of ko-nie in nioi, ha-buchi is wide and brilliant, few ashi;
Jihada is mokume itame mixed, utsuri;
Jitetsu of good color;
Boshi is ko-maru;
Bo-hi on both sides
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: Noritsugu was one of the Emperor Go-Toba's chosen smiths.
TACHI
Signed Ichi.
Date mid-Kamakura
Length of 28.4 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, koshi zori;
Hamon is juka choji, very deep and extremely flamboyant, mainly nioi with sparse ko-nie and kinsuji, deep ashi and yo;
Jihada is itame with no ji nie, strong utsuri;
Boshi is midare komi;
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: This is a very good and characteristic example of the developed Fukuoka Ichimonji style. The founder of the school is said to have been Norimune of Bizen, one of the Emperor Go-Toba's smiths. The primary smiths of this school did not use their name only. Followers signed using the character 'Ichi' meaning first. This blade was an heirloom of the Aoyama family.
TACHI
Signed Nagamitsu.
Date mid-Kamakura;
Length of 27.5 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri of beautiful form, tori zori;
Hamon is midare and gunome midare of nie in nioi, profuse kinsuji and inazuma;
Jihada is mokume and itame mixed, the mokume being particularly noticeable, ohada, chikei, zanguri, hada is very prominent;
Boshi is midare komi, yakizumi;
Nakago is suriage, the color of the patina is superlative;
Comments: Nagamitsu was one of the greatest of the early Osafune smiths and his works are represented in the list of national treasures. Later in life he signed using the name Junkei. This sword, hereditary in the Tsuchiya family, is a most excellent example of his work. Accompanying authentication by Honami Koson.
TACHI
Signed Senjuin and Uesugi Terutora shoji.
Date mid-Kamakura;
Length of 26.2 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, tori zori;
Hamon is hoso suguba with slight irregularities, hotsure, wide ha-buchi of ko-nie, kinsuji;
Jihada is a running itame, slight utsuri;
Boshi is maru;
Bo-hi on both sides;
Nakago is suriage with Uesugi Terutora shoji cut out and folded over (orikaeshi);
Comments: This inscription, added later, indicates that the sword belonged to the famous Uesugi Kenshin of Echigo. The Senjuin worked in the Yamato tradition and used the name of the temple as their only signature.
TACHI (not illustrated)
Signed Kanenaga.
Date late Kamakura;
Length of 29 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, koshi zori, fumbari;
Hamon is suguba of ko-nie, nijuba in the mono-uchi, hotsure, uchinoke;
Jihada is running ko-itame;
Jitetsu is extremely fine;
Boshi is maru;
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: Tegai Kanenaga, one of the most famous of the late Kamakura Yamato smiths, was a man of older style than his contemporaries. This sword has a sayagaki dated 1745 which states that it was made a gift from the imperial palace on that date.
TACHI
Signed Rai Kunimitsu.
Date late Kamakura;
Length of 26.4 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is suguha of nie, very fine kinsuji and inazuma;
Jihada is ko-mokume with some o-hada;
Jitetsu is very fine and the color is dark;
Bo-hi on both sides;
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: Good and typical Yamashiro den of the period.
TANTO (not illustrated)
Unsigned, attributed to the Rai school.
Date late Kamakura;
Length of 10.1 inches;
Shape u-no kubi zukuri of classic form;
Hamon hoso-suguba of ko-nie, sunagashi, kinsuji;
Jihada is ko-itame ko-mokume mixed;
Jitetsu is extremely fine with small ji-nie;
Nakago is slightly suriage;
Comments: This is a typical Yamashiro blade of very high quality.
TANTO
Signed Kunihiro.
Date late Kamakura;
Length of 7.5 inches;
Shape hira zukuri take-no-ko zori;
Hamon is gunome midare of nie, kinsuji, inazuma;
Nashiji hada, profuse ji-nie;
Jitetsu is brilliant;
Boshi is ko-maru with long kaeri;
Hori on omote is lotus and jewel, ura kaeri;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Kunihiro was the son of Shinto Kunimitsu, progenitor of the Soshu tradition, and may have succeeded to his father's name. His work is rare.
TACHI (not illustrated)
Signed Masamune in gold, authenticated by Honami Kojo.
Date late Kamakura;
Length of 28.4 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is o-midare of nie, sunagashi, inazuma, profuse nie;
Jihada is o-itame with a feeling of ayasugi, profuse ji nie, hada is very prominent;
Jitetsu is very clear and translucent;
Boshi is hakkake;
Bo-hi on both sides
Nakago is o-suriage;
Comments: Masamune is probably the most famous of all swordsmiths. Most blades made by him have been shortened, losing the signature. Only three signed blades by him are known to exist. Under his leadership the Soshu method became clearly established.
TACHI
Signed Norishige in gold, authenticated by Honami Koyu, ura a rectangular gold plug engraved 'Fubuki' (Snowstorm).
Date late Kamakura;
Length of 28.8 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, tori zori;
Hamon is midare of nie, sunagashi, kinsuji, inazuma, some ara nie;
Jitetsu is medium density, well forged, strong feeling;
Boshi is maru;
Futatsu ji-bi on both sides
Nakago is o-suriage;
Comments: Etchu Norishige, with Goro Niudo Masamune, was a student of Shintogo Kunimitsu. This sword is a good example of early Soshu style. Accompanying origami by Honami Tadaaki, kofuda by Honami Shichirobei, Honami Saburobei, and three others, accompanying letters by Honami Tadaaki and Honami Tadamasa, and a poem by Saito Soho, Lord of Nishikawa Jiri, Omi province, written about 1558. This sword was an heirloom in the family of Kyogoku, Lord of Sanuki, a member of the Sasaki family.
KATANA (not illustrated)
Signed Sagami Kuni no ju nin Sadamune.
Date 1330;
Length of 30.3 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, wide and long with o-kissaki;
Hamon is o-midare, very deep, sunagashi, tobiyaki, inazuma;
Jihada is itame, yubashiri (rounded);
Boshi is midare komi;
Hori on omote is renge, gomabashi-bi, and bonji, ura is Tsumetsuki-ken, and bonji
Nakago is ubu of tanago bara form;
Comments: Sadamune is believed to have been the adopted son of Masamune and, after the master, is probably the most famous of the Soshu smiths. Signed work is extremely rare.
TACHI (not illustrated)
Attributed to Shizu Saburo Kaneuji, sword is named in gold 'Sasa no Tsuyu' (Dew on the Grass) .
Date late Kamakura.
Length of 26.8 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, typical Soshu form;
Hamon is notare midare of nie, kinsuji, inazuma, ashi, some feeling of gunome;
Jihada itame mokume mixed, yubashiri;
Jitetsu is very clear and damp feeling;
Boshi is kaeri;
Bo-hi on both sides;
Nakago is o-suriage;
Comments: Kaneuji was one of the Masamune ju-tetsu or ten rival students of Masamune. He originally came from Yamato and after his study with Masamune migrated to Mino where he founded the fifth of the five traditional schools (Gokkaden). An excellent and beautiful sword, very typical of his work.
KATANA
Signed Kinju in gold.
Date late Kamakura;
Length of 26 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is suguba gunome choji of nie, sunagashi, kinsuji, inazuma, ashi, hotsure;
Jihada is o-mokume with some itame, chikei;
Hori on omote is gomabashi-bi, ura is koshi-bi and soye-bi ;
Nakago is o-suriage;
Comments: One of the Masamune ju-tetsu. Later migrated to Mino and established a school. His work is rare.
TANTO (not illustrated)
Signed Soshu no ju Tsunamitsu.
Date late Kamakura;
Length of 12.3 inches;
Shape hira zukuri, chukan zori sunnobi tanto;
Hamon is suguba of nie in nioi;
Jihada is itame, ji-nie, chikei, hada is distinct;
Jitetsu is open;
Boshi is ko-maru;
Bo0hi and soye-bi on both sides
Nakago is tanago bara;
Comments: Said to have been first a student of Yukimitsu and later of Masamune.
Return to the Table of Contents
The schism between the Ashikaga Shogun, Takauji, and the Emperor Go-Daigo resulted in the flight of Go-Daigo to Yoshino in Yamato and the establishment of a new Emperor in Kyoto. The period is sometimes called the 'Nan-Boku Cho Jidai' or the 'Age of the North and South Courts.' It was an era of heroes and scoundrels, of the proto-typical loyal samurai Kusunoki Masashige and Nitta Yoshisada and the proficient but brutal and treacherous brothers Ko. It was an age of incessant warfare and battles. The great demand for weapons naturally caused a general deterioration of quality in the sword, although master-smiths continued to produce work of the highest quality. Of particular note were the migrations of smiths to the province of Mino and the establishment of the last of the Gokkaden. The most important were Kaneuji and Kinju of Soshu (Masamune ju-tetsu) and a numerous group of Yamato smiths including Zenjo Kaneyoshi. Another important center which continued an ancient tradition was at Osafune in Bizen. These two provinces produced the major portion of the swords made in Japan.
WAKIZASHI
Signed Hasebe Kuninobu.
Date early Yoshino;
Length of 12.9 inches;
Shape hira zukuri ko wakizashi, wide and very thin, Enbun-Joji shape;
Hamon is ko-midare of ko-nie in nioi, ha-buchi is indistinct and watery (urumu), small kinsuji;
Jihada is o-mokume and itame mixed;
Jitetsu is fine;
Boshi on the omote is su-ken with bonji, ura is gomabashi-bi;
Nakago is funagata;
Comments: Hasebe Kuninobu was the son of Hasebe Kunishige, one of the ten students of Masamune. He also used the name Kunishige.
WAKIZASHI
Signed Kaneyoshi.
Date early Yoshino;
Length of 18.3 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, fumbari, slender delicate shape;
Hamon is hoso suguba of ko-nie, hotsure, kinsuji;
Jihada is ko-itame;
Jitetsu is fine;
Boshi is hakkake;
Nakago is suriage with signature retained and folded over (orikaeshi mei);
Comments: The Kaneyoshi were students of the Tegai of Yamato who later migrated to Mino and founded their own school. Originally this was a ko-dachi which was shortened and made into a wakizashi.
TANTO
Signed Nobukuni.
Date mid Yoshino;
Length of 11.3 inches;
Shape hira zukuri, chukan zori, Enbun-Joji shape;
Hamon is hoso suguba of ko-nie, slight hotsure;
Jihada is ko-mokume;
Jitetsu is very fine and beautifully worked;
Boshi is o-maru, slightly kareru;
Hori on omote is ken and bonji, ura is ken and bonji in hi (ukibori)
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: The first Nobukuni was a student of Sadamune of Soshu who later migrated to Kyoto and established his own famous school there. The Nobukuni were famous as carvers of horimono.
TANTO (not illustrated)
Unsigned, attributed to Soshu Hiromitsu .
Date early Yoshino;
Length of 13.8 inches;
Shape hira zukuri of Enbun-Joji style;
Hamon is suguba of ko-nie, nijuba, yo;
Jihada is a little open and has a feeling of wetness;
Jitetsu is fine and well forged, the hada is sinking;
Boshi is ko-maru with slight kaeri;
Nakago is ubu, tanago bara form;
Comments: Hiromitsu was a son or student of Sadamune of Soshu. The attribution is by Shimizu Toro.
KATANA
Signed Tomoshige.
Date mid Yoshino;
Length of 26.5 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is midare of nie, togare, kinsuji;
Hada is mokume with some itame mixed, utsuri;
Jitetsu is of medium density, a little open;
Boshi is midare komi with some hakkake;
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: The first Tomoshige of Kaga was a student of Rai Kunitoshi of Yamashiro. The work of the school; however, contains the elements of the styles of Mino, Bizen, and Soshu and is classified as wakimono (outside the main lines of school styles). This sword exhibits some tendency toward the koshi hiraita midare hamon (open hip, with valleys) which became popular during the Oei period.
TACHI
Signed Bizen Osafune Tomomitsu.
Date 1364;
Length of 28.9 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, koshi zori;
Hamon is gunome midare of nie, kinsuji, inazuma, sunagashi, nie saki, some hotsure;
Jihada is itame mokume mixed, profuse chikei;
Boshi is midare komi, yakizumi;
Bo-hi with bonji on both sides
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Tomomitsu was the son or brother of the famous O-Kanemitsu of Bizen, one of the ten students of Masamune. This blade has definite overtones of the Soshu style which are probably due to this relationship. The style is called Soden Bizen.
TACHI
Signed Naoe Kanehisa, in gold, authenticated by Honami Koson.
Date mid Yoshino;
Length of 28.3 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, strong koshi zori;
Hamon is suguba with center section of blade in gunome choji of nie, kinsuji, sunagashi;
Jihada is mokume and itame mixed;
Boshi is togare;
Nakago is o-suriage;
Comments: Kanehisa was the son of Kanetoshi, younger brother of Shizu Saburo Kaneuji (Masamune's student). This blade is of an older form and the hamon is unusual and interesting.
WAKIZASHI
Signed Hiromasa, in gold, authenticated by Honami Koson.
Date ;
Length of 15.3 inches;
Shape hira zukuri ko-wakizashi;
Hamon is o-midare of nie, ara nie, ashi, yo;
Jihada is masame, ji-nie becoming dense toward the point;
Boshi is togare with long kaeri;
Hori on omote is kuichigai-bi, ura is su-ken with jewel (tama)
Nakago is o-suriage;
Comments: Hiromasa was a man of the late Soshu tradition. Many of the earlier characteristics were changing and in some cases disappear entirely. The masame hada is a striking deviation from the norm.
Return to the Table of Contents
With the reconciliation of the two imperial houses and the re-unification of Japan, the Nan-Boku Cho came to an end. Political power continued to be vested in the Ashikaga Shoguns, but the inherent weakness of the system prevented the establishment of political unity. Petty warlords seized local power and the slight control exercised by the Ashikaga diminished until the Onin period (1467) when the country again exploded into civil war. The next one hundred years is known as the 'Sengoku Jidai' (Age of the Country at War). During this century, the country was utterly devastated and reduced to poverty. Kyoto, the ancient capital, was burned, an irretrievable loss. There are relatively few schools producing good work during the Muromachi period. The majority are kazuuchi mono (ready made) or were even mass produced. As always, however, some conscientious smiths continued to follow a tradition of excellence.
KATANA (not illustrated)
Signed Muramasa.
Date early Muromachi;
Length of 31.6 inches;
Shape shobu zukuri, very wide and long;
Hamon o-midare hamon of ko-nie in nioi;
Ha-hada;
Jitetsu has a feeling of softness and is clear;
Boshi is hakkake with long kaeri;
Hori on omote is Fudo and stylized cloud with bo-hi, ura is dragon with bo-hi;
Nakago is ubu of typical tanago bara form;
Comments: Muramasa blades excite a great deal of interest because of the numberless stories concerning their bloodthirstiness. They were supposed to have been particularly unlucky for the Tokugawa. Shirai Gompachi, the street killer, is said to have used a Muramasa blade. There were several smiths of the same name who followed the Mino tradition at Sengo in the province of Ise..
WAKIZASHI (not illustrated)
Signed Norimitsu, in gold.
Date early Muromachi;
Length of 20.7 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, fumbari;
Hamon suguba of ko-nie, hotsure, no activity in the ha;
Jihada o-mokume, few ji-nie;
Jitetsu open but not coarse;
Boshi maru;
Nakago o-suriage;
Comments: An early example of the Norimitsu line who worked at Osafune in Bizen. There were many smiths who used the name, some of very good quality. They were swords for practical use. This sword is of chu-mon uchi (special order) quality.
TACHI
Signed Bishu Osafune no ju Norimitsu.
Date 1471;
Length of 28.3 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, koshi zori, strong fumbari;
Hamon choji midare of nie, kinsuji, inazuma, ha-hada;
Jihada is mokume, yubashiri, profuse ji nie, hada is strongly marked, the pattern outlined with bright silvery lines;
Boshi maru with hakkake;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: There were seven smiths of this line, the second and third being the most important. This sword is most probably by the third.
KATANA (not illustrated)
Signed Bizen Osafune Katsumitsu.
Date 1494;
Length of 21.6 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, strong sori;
Hamon is suguba ko-midare of nie hotsure, kinsuji;
Jihada is mixed itame mokume;
Jitetsu is fine;
Boshi is midare komi (Bizen boshi) with hakkake;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Typical mid-Muromachi blade of the later Bizen mode with its roots in the style of Oei Bizen. There is nothing extreme and it may be called 'koroai' or 'just right.' A sword for practical use.
TANTO
Signed Bizen Kuni no ju Osafune Yosozaemon no Jo Sukesada.
Date 1529;
Length of 7.3 inches;
Shape moroha zukuri;
Hamon is suguba of nie, sunagashi, inazuma, kinsuji, hotsure;
Jihada is ko-itame, slight utsuri;
Jitetsu is dark and the yakiba very luminous;
Nakago is ubu Bizen;
Comments: There are forty one smiths of the Sukesada line recorded - and many more unrecorded. The first Yosozaemon is one of the most important of this line. The date on this blade is correct for the first.
TANTO (not illustrated)
Signed Bingo Mihara no ju Masachika.
Date 1533;
Length of 7.8 inches;
Shape hira zukuri, take-no-ko-zori;
Hamon is suguba ko-midare, ko-ashi, yo, nie are coarse and brilliant, wide ha-buchi;
Jihada is ko-mokume, approaching nashiji, ji-nie, yubashiri;
Boshi is ko-maru;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: .
KATANA
Signed Kanesada.
Date mid-Muromachi;
Length of 27.4 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, koshi zori;
Hamon is suguba of nie in nioi, fushi nie in the ha-buchi are very brilliant;
Jihada is very subtle ko-mokume;
Boshi is maru;
Bo-hi on both sides;
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: One of the early Kanesada of Mino, the first two smiths being the most important. An excellent blade with a firm and strong shape.
KATANA (not illustrated)
Signed Bishu Osafune Sukesada saku.
Date mid-Muromachi;
Length of 25.8 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, koshi zori, strong fumbari;
Hamon is choji midare with valleys of nioi, some formed like crab claws, typical Bizen togare tipped with nioi, koshi hiraita midare (open hipped);
Jihada is ko-itame;
Jitetsu is soft feeling and fine;
Boshi is midare komi;
Nakago is ubu of Bizen form;
Comments: This is a classic example of the mid-Muromachi blade of the Sukesada school made for practical use.
WAKIZASHI
Signed Hirosuke.
Date circa 1555;
Length of 15.5 inches;
Shape hira zukuri, slight sori;
Hamon is gunome choji of nie, sunagashi, small kinsuji, ha-hada;
Jihada is ko-mokume which is very prominent and which may be used as an exact example of mokume;
Jitetsu is bluish, somewhat open texture;
Boshi is midare komi;
Bo-hi on both sides;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Hirosuke is a smith of the Shimada school of Suruga.
TANTO
Signed Kanemichi.
Date late Muromachi;
Length of 10.6 inches;
Shape hira zukuri, slight sori;
Hamon is o-gunome, profuse nie in the area of the ha-buchi which is wide and brilliant;
Jihada is ko-mokume becoming masa close to the mune;
Jitetsu is fine and very clear;
Boshi is ko-maru (Mishina boshi);
Gomabashi-hi on omote, ura bo-hi;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Kanemichi was the founder of the prolific Mishina school of Mino which migrated to many parts of Japan during the succeeding period. Their blades are very numerous in western collections because of their rather obvious attractive qualities.
KATANA
Signed Bizen Kuni no ju Osafune Shichibei no ju Sukesada.
Date 1580;
Length of 26.1 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, koshi zori;
Hamon is midare mainly nie, ashi, yo, sunagashi, same ara nie;
Jihada is primarily mokume;
Jitetsu well forged with prominent hada;
Boshi is hakkake;
Nakago is ubu, Bizen form;
Comments: One of the better smiths of the Sukesada school. Chu-mon uchi (special order).
Although the true Edo period comes a little later, Keicho is taken as the date separating Koto (Old Swords) from Shinto (New Swords). Before Keicho, swords were made in the traditional style of the place where the smith worked. After 1596 the relocation of the Daimyo and the movement of their vassal smiths with them makes the identification of place by method extremely difficult. Additionally, the use for the first time of factory steels causes swords made using them to look alike and to lose their distinctive identity. Traditional methods were violated and the swords of the Shinto Tokuden have fine grain, wide hamon, and ara nie. They are brittle and will break.
As was so often true, the period began with a tremendous surge of inspired creativity. A large number of talented smiths studied with the great metal worker Umetada Mioji at Nishijin in Kyoto and with his co-worker Kunihiro at Ichijo Horikawa. Most of the great master smiths of the Edo period were derived from this school.
Inspired largely by the efforts of Suishinshi Masahide, we find at the beginning of the 19th century a movement to return to the early traditional methods and shapes. Unfortunately, the models chosen were many times early, shortened examples. The shape, therefore, leaves something to be desired. Several outstanding smiths came out of the Suishinshi school. these swords are called 'Shin-Shinto' or "Newer-New Swords.'
TANTO
Signed Yasutsugu, on ura 'while residing in Edo,' with the Tokugawa mon.
Date early Edo;
Length of 7.4 inches;
Shape moroha zukuri;
Hamon is suguba with wide ha-buchi of nie;
Jihada is ko-mokume, almost nashiji;
Hori on omote 'Hachiman' ;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: The first Yasutsugu was swordsmith to the Tokugawa Shogun, Ieyasu, and was accorded the honor of inscribing the Tokugawa mon on his work. His descendants continued this practice. Much of his work was decorated by the famous carver, Kinai of Echizen. He was the first to use foreign steel.
TACHI
Signed Hizen Kuni no ju nin Hironori. Recorded on the ura is a test dated 1662 in which two bodies were cut by the famous tester Yamano Kauemon no Jo Nagahisa.
Date circa 1600;
Length of 28.6 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, tori zori;
Hamon is o-choji midare of nie in nioi, kinsuji, inazuma, sunagashi, ashi;
Jihada is ko-itame, ji-nie;
Boshi is midare komi (Bizen boshi);
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: Hironori was a student of the first Tadayoshi of Hizen who was a student of Umetada Mioju. The name Nagahisa, the tester appears on many of the famous early Shinto blades.
WAKIZASHI (not illustrated)
Signed Tsuda Echizen no Kami Sukehiro.
Date 1672;
Length of 20.2 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is toran of nie, somewhat hotsure, small kinsuji, nie saki;
Jihada is nashiji, ji nie;
Jitetsu is very fine and homogeneous;
Boshi is hakkake;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Typical Shinto Tokuden. Sukehiro was noted for his beautiful toran ba, the conception of which was the product of his own creativity. One of the most famous of Shinto smiths.
KATANA
Signed Yamato no Kami Yasusada.
Date early Shinto;
Length of 27.5 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, heavy and wide;
Hamon is hiro suguba, wide ha-buchi of ko-nie, ko-ashi;
Jihada is ko-mokume - almost nashiji, ji-nie;
Boshi is o-maru with long kaeri;
Bo-hi on both sides, ato bori (put in later)
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: A smith of the Edo school of Musashi. Typical Shinto Tokuden.
TACHI
Signed Hizen Kuni no ju Mutsu no Kami Tadayoshi.
Date circa 1665;
Length of 27.9 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is chu-suguba, wide ha-buchi of ko-nie, very brilliant;
Jihada is nashiji, very fine and dense;
Boshi is maru;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: This blade is by the third Tadayoshi and is a definitive example of his work.
KATANA (not illustrated)
Signed Inoue Izumi no Kami Kunisada.
Date 1671, with chrysanthemum;
Length of 28.1 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, slight sori;
Hamon is notare gunome choji, profuse nie in the ha-buchi;
Jihada is nashiji, ji-nie;
Boshi is maru;
Bo-hi on both sides;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Typical Osaka yakidashi (straightening of the hamon at the nakago). Kunisada was the name used by Inoue Shinkai prior to 1672. This blade is typical of the Osaka style.
WAKIZASHI
Signed Inoue Shinkai.
Date 1678, with chrysanthemum;
Length of 20.2 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, shallow sori;
Hamon is notare, wide ha-buchi of nie, inazuma, Osaka yakidashi;
Jihada is nashiji;
Boshi is maru;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: This blade is comparable to others by this famous smith.
WAKIZASHI
Signed Awataguchi Omi no Kami Tadatsuna.
Date early Shinto;
Length of 21.2 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is hitatsura yaki of nie and nioi, Osaka yakidashi, nie saki, sunagashi;
Jihada is itame with masame in the shinogi ji;
Boshi is o-maru (Osaka boshi);
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: This blade is by the first Tadatsuna of Osaka, progenitor of a highly regarded line who were especially notable for their carving. The hamon of hitatsura is not normal to this smith's style.
WAKIZASHI (not illustrated)
Signed Awataguchi Omi no Kami Tadatsuna.
Date circa 1688;
Length of 20.2 inches;
Shape is hira zukuri, wide and heavy with slight sori;
Hamon is chu-suguba of nie;
Jihada is nashiji;
Jitetsu is typical Shinto;
Boshi is maru;
Hori on omote is a dragon, ura is a ken, the carving is strong
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Tadatsuna the second was famous for his carving of horimono as well as his skill as a smith. The hamon is out of style for the smith.
KATANA (not illustrated)
Signed Echigo no Kami Kanesada.
Date early Shinto;
Length of 28 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is o-choji midare - close to toran, nie in nioi;
Jihada is almost nashiji of excellent color;
Boshi is maru;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Sakakura school of Settsu. Alternative name used by Terukane, the second Kanesada. The line is derived from the Hidari Mutsu school.
KATANA
Signed Bungo Yukihira sue Takada Kawachi no Kami Motoyuki shichi ju ichi sai saku.
Date 1716;
Length of 33.4 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri;
Hamon is o-midare of nie with ara nie, nie saki;
Jihada is o-itame, very prominent;
Boshi is ichimai;
Bo-hi on both sides
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Originally of the ancient Bungo Takada school, became a member of the Later Tadayoshi school of Hizen.
WAKIZASHI
Signed Oku Yamato no Kami Taira no Ason Motohira.
Date 1797;
Length of 16.6 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, almost osoraku zukuri with very long kissaki, wide and heavy;
Hamon is notare midare, ara nie, sunagashi, kinsuji;
Jihada is o-itame, coarse ji nie;
Boshi is midare komi;
Hori on ura is gomabashi hi with renge
Nakago is suriage;
Comments: Recent Satsuma school whose origins were founded in Yamato. He excelled in making swords in Soshu style.
WAKIZASHI
Signed Masahide, with kakihan and stamped seal.
Date 1811;
Length of 15.4 inches;
Shape hira zukuri, Enbun-Joji shape;
Hamon is suguba of nioi with ko-nie in the ha-buchi;
Jihada is ko-mokume, damp feeling and translucent;
Boshi is ko-maru;
Hori on omote 'Hachiman dai Bosatsu,' ura 'Namu Myoho Renge Kyo';
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Suishinshi Masahide was the inspiration for the renaissance in the art of the swordsmith which occurred about 1804. He advocated a return to the traditional methods and shapes of the earlier great periods. His influence was widely felt.
KATANA
Signed Daijoka no ju Koyama Bizen no Suke Munetsugu and So-Ichiro Munetsugu Saijin kore.
Date 1831;
Length of 26.3 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, wide and heavy;
Hamon is ko-choji midare, some juka choji, inazuma, kinsuji;
Jihada is ko-mokume with many ji-nie and chikei;
Boshi is o-maru with small kaeri;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Kato school of Musashi, signed by both the first and second Munetsugu. The first was a student of Tsunateru of Dewa.
TACHI
Signed Keio gannen hachi gatsu hi Fujiwara Kiyondo, on ura Akita Innai tame Saito Ujichika kitau kore.
Date 1865;
Length of 27.4 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri, slight sori;
Hamon is notare gunome choji, ashi, inazuma, chikei;
Jihada is ko-mokume in masa (very pale striations), ji -nie;
Boshi is ko-maru with streamers of nie;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Kiyondo was a student of Kiyomaro, founder of the Yamaura school of Edo. Many of their blades resemble the style of Shizu.
KATANA
Signed Gassan Sadakazu kinsei no kitai, tei shitsu gigei in, with kakihan.
Date 1906;
Length of 28.5 inches;
Shape shinogi zukuri of beautiful curve;
Hamon is juka choji with deep ashi and yo, mainly nioi with ko-nie;
Jihada is ko-mokume with slight utsuri, very fine ji nie;
Boshi is midare komi;
Bo-hi on both sides
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: This blade was made by special appointment for the Emperor Meiji and is a masterpiece. Sadakazu was famous for his ability to duplicate the work of earlier masters and his carving of horimono was unrivalled in any age. This sword is in the style of Bizen.
TANTO
Signed Bizen Kuni Osafune no ju Toshimitsu.
Made in 1961 for Robert Haynes;
Length of 9.2 inches;
Shape is hira zukuri chukan zori of excellent form;
Hamon is midare, mainly nie, sunagashi, kinsuji, strong activity in the ha-buchi;
Jihada is running ko-itame;
Jitetsu is very clear and deep;
Boshi is ko-maru with hakkake;
Nakago is ubu;
Comments: Toshimitsu is the last smith living in Osafune, working there for love of the art. this blade is a most beautiful example of his work.
Return to the Table of Contents
The fittings for the Japanese sword were designed for both functional and aesthetic purposes. The artist value of these fittings has survived not only the edict prohibiting the wearing of the sword, but the passing of the artists as well. In spite of this disappearance of the artisans, their contributions to the beauty of the mounted sword have become a distinct art form. This form has gained popularity in the western hemisphere - possibly because of the numerous facets which comprise the various mountings.
There are techniques and skills to satisfy the most exacting connoisseur as well as striking colors and designs to intrigue event the casual observer.
The fittings may be enjoyed on several levels. Some collectors acquire pieces for the obvious visual beauty of the decoration. Others collect as many various types or as many of a single type as possible. Those who go more deeply into the subject may be strongly influenced by the arbiters and judges of fashion in Japan and will at first adhere to their dictates, later he may follow his own path. What ever way the student chooses, the enjoyment and study within this field will offer both satisfaction and a challenge seldom to be found in any other.
This exhibit is primarily intended to illustrate the chronological development of the sword and its fittings. Since examples of tsuba prior to 1400 are very rare, even in museums and shrines in Japan, we are primarily confined to the 500 year span from 1400 to 1900.
Particular attention has been paid to the selection of examples which are typical of individual schools and the eras in which they enjoyed their greatest success. The styles of design and execution are sharply defined in many instances; but the influence of one school on another or a then-current fashion for particular subjects or techniques has provided the students and the experts with endless opinions and grounds for forming them.
All descriptions, datings and information in this catalogue are based on an exhaustive review of the literature on the subject. This research is further amplified by individual contributions from those who have made lifetime studies in the areas represented in this collection.
It will be noted that some pieces in the tsuba section have the annotation that they are certified pieces. This means that these pieces have been examined by one of the experts in Japan and they have passed judgment on the authenticity and quality of the piece. These certificates are written on the inside of the box lid in which the pieces are stored. The experts who have written these certificates mentioned in this exhibit are:
Kuwabara Yojiro, one of the leading experts in the early part of this century.
Ogura Soemon (Amiya Soe), author, dealer, and prime source of fine tsuba in the same period.
Torigoye Kazutaro (Kodo), author of many works on both the blade and the tsuba, now living in Okayama city. He is today the leading expert in the field of tsuba and is the mentor of the growing group of students in the west.
The Nihon Bijutsu Token Hozon Kyokai, the society for the preservation of Japanese art swords in Tokyo, headed by Mr. Hosokawa and Dr. Homma. They issue certificates in several grades from Tokubetsu Kicho (white paper), Marutoku (green paper), to higher grade certificates, which are issued only after a board of experts has passed on objects submitted for their consideration.
Robert E. Haynes
Tsuba on display at the exhibit.
|
Return to the Table of Contents
The earliest extant tsuba were made prior to the eighth century. They are the HOJU type, either iron plate, rarely decorated with silver inlay, or copper plate, usually covered with sheet gold. The iron plate example (described as number 5 in the sword section) is typical of the later style of Hoju tsuba. Examples of tsuba made in the Nara period (710-793) are almost nonexistent outside of Japan. A few examples of tsuba of the Heian period (794-1185) are to be found in the West, such as number 65 (not illustrated). A copy of the leather plate style of tsuba (Nerikawa tsuba) is displayed and shows what the original type of this tsuba made in the Heian period resembled. The rim cover of gilt copper and the black lacquer surface are typical of the old leather fighting tsuba. Another leather tsuba, probably of the Kamakura period (1186-1333) has a center core of iron and a raised lacquer decoration on the surface. This is a very rare example.
|
5 Not illustrated.
65 Not illustrated.
66 Not illustrated. |
Swordsmith tsuba made prior to 1450 are exceedingly rare. The few examples extant are treasured by shrines and private collectors in Japan. From 1450 forward, examples are more numerous, but do not become common until the nineteenth century. At that time many of the famous Shinto and Shin-Shinto swordsmiths turned their hand to the making of tsuba in the popular style of the day or in the Nobuiye revival style.
|
67 |
Return to the Table of Contents
Large tsuba of thin plate with simple perforations are commonly called armorsmith tsuba, though there is no proof that the were actually made by the ancient armorers. It is more likely that they are the work of the earliest professional tsuba makers, though their individual identity is unknown. Examples date from about 1350 to 1900.
|
68 69 70 |
The genealogy of this family is recorded, though it is thought to be in error since it is now known that there were several generations who used the same name, such as Iyesada and Iyetada.
|
71 72 |
The artists of this school were students, or followers, of the Saotome masters. The majority of their work is of common quality; though in rare cases they created a few noble pieces. Signed work, such as Yamashiro (no) ju Tempo, Sanada, or Sanoda Tempo, is slightly better than the average example. This school worked during the Edo period (1600-1850). |
No illustrations. |
The name for this style of tsuba is said to be derived from a type of lacquer decorated with a similar style of carving, known as Kamakura-Bori lacquer. There is a theory that a few examples of the tsuba of this style may actually date from the Yoshino period (circa 1350), though there is no proof of this at this time. This style of tsuba went out of fashion in the early seventeenth century. There are no signed examples. |
No illustrations. |
The name for this school style is taken from the Onin era (1467-68). It is thought that this style of tsuba was made at least fifty years prior to this date and for a hundred years after. A few examples were made during the Edo period. Individual artists are unknown and there are no signed examples.
|
73 |
The name for this school is derived from the area of which Kyoto is the center. The individual artists signed their work in rare cases, but no family or school seems apparent. The school style is characterized by the decorative inlay of brass, either flush to the plate surface, or slightly raised above it, or a combination of the two. Ninety percent of all brass inlay tsuba are the work of this school which was active from about 1450 to 1850.
|
74 75 Not illustrated. 76 |
In addition to the above two schools there were the Kaga and Koike Yoshiro schools of brass inlay style. A few members of the Koike school moved to Okayama in Bizen. They worked there for a few generations during the Edo period. The Kaga school extended through the entire Edo period.
|
77 78 79 Not illustrated. |
This school had a parallel development to the Heianjo brass inlay school. By the seventeenth century, the two schools were completely integrated. The early style of this school is characterized by designs in bold positive openwork with occasional sparse brass inlay. A few signatured examples exist but they seem to be independent artists.
|
80 |
The development and growth of the Kyoto openwork school was parallel to, but slightly later than, the Heianjo openwork school. Its beginning was about 1550 and it reached its peak by 1580. The style was made until late in the Edo period; but the quality was in continuous decline during this time. The Daigoro school was a branch development of the Kyoto openwork school shortly after 1700. Their style gave new impetus to the then stagnant designs of the parent school. |
No illustrations. |
Kaneiye tsuba may be divided into many classes. First are the few extant examples by the first master, who signed Joshu Fushimi (no) ju Kaneiye. Then there are the examples by the first artist, who signed Yamashiro Kuni Fushimi (no) ju Kaneiye. In addition there are a few signed and unsigned examples made by students and followers of the second artist. Next there is the Saga Kaneiye school work. These are the work of the later followers after the school had moved to Saga in Hizen. They were made from 1600 to about 1850. In addition to the Saga style, there are numerous examples made at Aizu or on the docks at Yokohama as imitations for sale in Tokyo or to the foreigners. These imitations of the Saga style comprise more than eighty percent of the existing signed or unsigned Kaneiye tsuba.
|
81 Not illustrated. 82 |
Tsuba signed with the name Nobuiye are rather common. They may be divided into the following types: the first and second Nobuiye who lived during Momoyama to early Edo period (1550-1625); the dozen or so artists who used this name from 1625 to 1850 and worked in various provinces, such as Kaga, Kozuke, and Akasaka; the many forgeries in the style of the first Nobuiye made by Iwata Norisuke (first and second) and lesser imitators, who cashed in on the revival of the Nobuiye style about 1850. These forgeries account for the majority of the Nobuiye tsuba that are seen today.
|
83 Not illustrated. 84 |
There are no known examples of tsuba by Myochin masters signed with the family name that were made before the early Edo period. After 1700, tsuba by this school were made in great quantities and followed the style of various prevailing schools of the later Edo period. One cannot say there is a typical Myochin style. The quality of the later work of this school is rather common.
|
85 |
Authentic examples by the first two masters of this school are very rare, though forgeries of their work may be found by the dozens, most of which were made by the first and second Iwata Norisuke, (at least the better ones were). This school of Owari province particularly appealed to the samurai class. Tsuba of this school are usually signed.
|
86 Not illustrated. |
The first examples of this style of tsuba were made during the period from 1450 to 1550. The second period of production is from 1550 to about 1625. The third period, consisting mainly of imitations of the first periods, extends from 1625 to about 1800, then the style disappeared. The majority of the extant examples are from the third period.
|
87 |
The style of this school is very difficult to define. The early work resembles that of the Yamakichibei school; but after the third generation the style became mixed with that of other schools. The only characteristics of the school are thick plate and many examples with acid etched designs. The Hoan divided into several groups and at least two of these moved from Owari province to start new branch schools. |
No illustrations. |
There were several independent small groups who worked in the Owari area in addition to the three schools mentioned above. The first and second Sadahiro were independent artists whose work is almost invariably of good quality and shows fine treatment of the iron plate, with strong decoration, and small amounts of inlay.
|
88 |
Little is known of the artists who signed Nara Kaji, except their names, and the approximate period in which they worked. The best examples show a strong resemblance to good Owari style work, rather than Nara style. Examples of this school are exceedingly rare.
|
89 |
The style of tsuba made by this Owari school was very popular with the samurai as early as the middle of the Muromachi period (1450). This popularity continued until late in the Edo age. First period examples date from 1450-1550. Second period examples date from 1550-1650. Third period examples, after 1650, are imitations of the first two periods.
|
90 |
The Yagyu style did not appear until the middle of the Edo period (1750). It was very popular for about one hundred years. Originally the designs used for these tsuba were thirty six in number (san-ju-roku kasen); later this number was expanded to more than a hundred and fifty designs. There were also imitations made by other schools in the Owari area.
|
91 |
The date of origin of the first mirror maker tsuba, of cast bronze, is not known. At this time the date is fixed as about 1400 or slightly earlier. Examples of Yamagane plate were made until the early Edo age. Examples in brass were made from 1600 to about 1750.
|
92 Not illustrated. 93 |
Tsuba and other mountings made by these artists date for the most part from the middle of the Muromachi period (1450). They were continuously made for the next three hundred years; but the quality steadily declined.
|
94 95 96 97 |
Tsuba of this type were made by unrecorded artists who worked in the period from 1400 to 1600. Some were students of the Goto school and there is an uncertain relationship to the later Kinko schools which developed from these earlier styles.
|
98 99 100 |
The Goto developed in Mino province during the Muromachi period (ca. 1400). Goto Yujo (1440-1512) and his followers were the main line of this school after moving from Mino to Kyoto about 1460. The Kyoto school became the dominant group and gave birth to the many branch schools of the Edo period. The Kaga school was independent of the Kyoto school during the Edo period.
|
101 102 103 Not illustrated.
Not illustrated.
Not illustrated. 110 |
During the Edo period the Mito area became one of the largest centers of production of various styles of tsuba. The majority of the schools and independent artists made mass production pieces of stereotype designs that may be seen in vast quantities. A few masterpieces were produced despite the general mediocrity of the work of this area.
|
112 |
The first Yasuchika is considered to be one of the three great Nara masters (Nara San-saku), with Nara Toshinaga and Sugiura Joi. the style of Yasuchika owed more to his heritage in Shonai as a student of the Shoami than to his tenuous relationship with Toshinaga and Joi.
|
113 114 115 Not illustrated. |
The Nara workers were master decorators in the Goto style in their early development. To distinguish their work from that of the Goto school, they chose to inlay their decoration on iron plate rather than on soft metal plate. The best of their work in this style will have inlay of Goto quality on iron plate of superior forged and hammered texture.
|
116 Not illustrated. 117 Not illustrated. 118 Not illustrated. 119 |
The Hamano artists seem to have branched from the Nara school. Some examples that are now labeled Ko-Nara are in fact Ko-Hamano work. This school was very extensive and during the Edo period produced readily identifiable examples of better than average quality for the most part.
|
120 121 Not illustrated. 122 Not illustrated. 123 Not illustrated. |
The origin of this school is unknown. It is now thought that they were a branch of the Ko-Shoami school who broke away sometime in the late Muromachi period (about 1550). The earliest work that bears a signature are those pieces signed Mitsutada. In the past it had been thought that Myoju was the founder of this school; but his true position is not known. He may have founded one style as a branch of the main school.
|
124 125 |
The name Shoami (which may be translated, "true, or original, men of the arts") is the oldest family name we have recorded who were professional tsuba makers. The origin of this family is unknown but they have left unsigned examples in armorsmith style that date about 1450. The first signed examples do not appear until early in the Edo period (1625). At that time the school dispersed from Kyoto to many of the provincial capitals, from Hiroshima to Dewa. There are several hundred recorded artists in this school.
|
126 127 128 129 130 131 132 Not illustrated. 133 |
The Akasaka were students of the Kyoto openwork school who moved to Akasaka in Edo, about 1625. They were under the employ of Kariganeya Hikobei, a shop owner and artist, who created the designs and a few pieces. This school had many students and flourished until the end of the Edo period.
|
134 135 |
The Kinai school in Echizen originated early in the Edo period. There are eight recorded generations, all of whom signed "Echizen (no) ju Kinai." Extant examples of the first Kinai are almost nonexistent, though the later work of this school is very common. |
No illustrations. |
Though the true origin of this artist is unknown, it seems obvious from his style of work that he was a student of the Tachi fittings makers of the late Muromachi period. When he moved to Higo province, under the patronage of Hosokawa Tadaoki (1564-1645), he became the teacher of the first Nishigaki and the senior artist of the Higo group.
|
136 Not illustrated. |
It has been stated that Matashichi came from Owari to work for Hosokawa Tadaoki. The quality of his iron plate and the designs he employed would indicate that his origin was more likely from Kyoto, rather than Owari. He is the most renowned artist of the Higo group. The Hayashi family extended through eight generations.
|
137 Not illustrated. 138 |
The first Nishigaki Kanshiro (Yoshihiro) was a student of Hirata Hikozo; but he owes his style more to Matashichi than to Hikozo. There were eight generations of this family. The later generations were students of the Kumagai school of Higo.
|
139 140 Not illustrated. 141 Not illustrated. 142 |
Shimizu Jingo I lived at Yatsushiro (often misread Hachi Dai, 8th generation), as did the succeeding generations. The style of the first two Jingos owes a great deal to the brass inlay Heianjo school of Kyoto and no doubt the first Jingo was a student, or member, of that school. This school also did damascene inlay (nunome) work.
|
147 |
There were four members of this school. The work of the first, Masatada (1766-1820), is unsigned and very rare. The work of the second, Fukanobu (1798-1851), is competent and rather common. The third master, Rakuju Masayasu (1817-1884), was an exceptional artist in nearly every style. His best work is considered second only to that of Hayashi Matashichi. The younger brother of Rakuju, Chuhachi (died 1886) made a few tsuba in the style of his brother.
|
148 |
There were a number of smaller schools and many independent artists working in Higo province through most of the Edo period. The most important of these are: the Toyama family, Nakane Heihachiro, Miyamoto Musashi, Manichibo, the Suwa family, Misumi Koji, Kumagai, the Tsuboe school, and the Edo Higo.
|
149 150 Not illustrated. 151 Not illustrated. 152 |
Ko-Hagi tsuba (meaning tsuba of early Choshu style) are in reality Kyoto openwork tsuba and have only a tenuous relationship to the old Choshu style. Tsuba of this design were made during the entire Edo age.
|
154 |
There were many families of tsuba artists living in Choshu province. The Kawaji, Nakai, Okamoto, Okada, Nakabara, Inouye, Yaji, Kaneko, Itoga, in addition to a number of lesser schools and independent artists. The best examples of their work are excellent; but the majority are very common.
|
155 Not illustrated. 156 Not illustrated. |
There were several schools and independent artists working in the Sendai area. The two most important of these are Sendai Kiyosada and Sendai Zembei.
|
158 Not illustrated. 159 Not illustrated. |
The first master is recorded as working in armorsmith style. The later generations tended to follow the styles that were popular during their respective periods.
|
160 |
In addition to the Shoami of Shonai, a number of other schools and independent artists worked in the Dewa area. Two of the best masters were Ikeda Kazutsugu and Katsurano Sekibun, first and second.
|
161 Not illustrated. 162 |
|
163 164 |
The true story of Soten style tsuba is unknown; but it can be said that better than 95% are later work in imitation of what must have been one style made during the lifetime of the first and second Soten. Most of these imitations were either made in Kyoto by the Hiragiya school, at Aizu by the Shoami school, or at the docks of Yokohama intended fro sale to the Europeans and Americans. |
No illustrations. |
Sahari is a very hard alloy that was originally used as a decorative metal inlay on gun barrels. It was applied later by the Kunitomo family and the Hazama workers to the decoration of tsuba on either iron plate or soft metal plate.
|
165 166 Not illustrated. |
Early examples of Hirata gold Shippo (cloisons of gold wire) with translucent enamel paste are very rare. The majority of the extant cloisonné fittings were made in the 19th century for export purposes, either incorporating old iron plates or using contemporary plates made by other artists.
|
167 168 |
In the strict sense of the word, Namban should refer only to those fittings which have foreign subjects, other than Korean and Chinese (which were not considered to be foreign). Similar tsuba with Chinese style designs, of symmetrical proportions, are Kanton tsuba. Those with native subjects, of asymmetrical proportions are Kagonami tsuba. In addition to these styles, there were several schools at Nagasaki, such as Jakushi, Mitsuhiro, Kunishige, Umetada of Hizen, and a native inlay school. They flourished through the entire Edo period.
|
169 170 171 Not illustrated. |
Though the iron plate tsuba artists still exercised their skill throughout the Edo period, it was the Kinko who dominated the age. From a slow beginning, as students of the Goto school about 1600, they expanded to the position where by 1850 nearly every school was obliged to emulate the soft metal plate or at least to imitate their style. It was the merchant class who patronized their art and made their style so popular. A slight revulsion against this opulence was expressed by the revival of the old spirit of the simple iron tsuba; but this lasted but a few years and was soon engulfed by an even gaudier style and technical virtuosity that came to its zenith in the period from 1900 to 1920. This style was more akin to naturalistic painting in metal, with a full palette of colors and three dimensional carving. They had lost the spirit and the utilitarian aspects of the true sword guard; but then, the sword was not intended for use at this time and these pieces must be admired for their technical perfection. And thus they brought the age of the tsuba artist to an end.
|
172 173 174 175 176 Not illustrated. 177 Not Illustrated. 179 |
Tsuba is labeled at 96; however, item 96 is described as fuchi-kashira, with appropriate illustrations.
Tsuba is not labeled. Possibly should be item 107. |
|
The Glossary consists of figures that illustrate the terms and a vocabulary list.
Return to the Table of Contents
ANA: hole. ARA-NIE: coarse or large nie (see Hada Patterns above for other patterns). ASHI: "legs" extending into hamon (see Hamon Shapes above). BOHI: straight simple groove. BONJI: debased Sanskrit characters. BOSHI: pattern of hamon in point (see Boshi Shapes above). CHIKEI (jikei): shining line of martensite in the ji. CHOJI: clove shaped hamon (see Hamon Shapes above). CHUKAN ZORI: straight short blade (see Sori above for other shapes). CHU-SUGUHA: medium width straight hamon (see Hamon Shapes above for other shapes). DAI-SHO: long and short pair of swords, with matching fittings and sometimes matched blades. FUCHI-KASHIRA: metal collar around base of hilt & cap of hilt (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). FUMBARI: narrowing of blade from hilt to point. FUNAGATA: boat-shape nakago (see Nakago and Nakago Tip Shapes above for other shapes). FUSHI: irregularity in hamon, like knot (see Hamon Shapes above for other shapes). FUTATSU JI-BI: double groove along full length of blade. GOMABASHI-HI: short double groove resembling chop sticks. GUNOME: repeated series of controlled irregularities in hamon (sambon sugi) (see Hamon Shapes above). HA: edge of sword. HADA (jihada): the figures formed by the juncture of welds in the ji (see Hada Patterns above). HA-BUCHI: the area of transition between the ha and the ji. HA-HADA: figures formed by the juncture of welds in the ji (see Hada Patterns above). HAKIKAKE (hakkake): broom-swept pattern in the boshi (see Boshi Shapes above). HAKKAKE (hakikake): broom-swept pattern in the boshi (see Boshi Shapes above). HAMON: pattern of the tempered edge (see Hamon Shapes above). HITATSURA: pattern of the detached areas of hardened steel over entire blade. HI: any groove. HIRA ZUKURI: flat blade without shinogi (see Blade Shapes above). HIRO: wide. HITSUANA: openings on either side of central opening in a tsuba. HORI: carving. HOTSURE: an unraveling or looseness of the hamon seen in habuchi (see Hamon Shapes above). ICHIMAI-BOSHI: composed entirely of hard steel (see Boshi Shapes above). INAZUMA: shining line of martensite in the ha resembling lightning. ITAME: hada like elongated or irregular wood grain (see Hada Patterns above). JI: area between hamon and the shinogi. JIHADA (hada): the figures formed by the juncture of welds in the ji (see Hada Patterns above). JIKEI (chikei): shining line of martensite in the ji. JI-NIE: nie in the area between the hamon and the shinogi. JIRI (shiri): tip of the nakago (see Nakago and Nakago Tip Shapes above). JI-TETSU: the steel itself, with special reference to its qualities JUKA-CHOJI: double choji (see Hamon Shapes above for other shapes). KAERI: (return) turn-back of the boshi (see Boshi Shapes above). KAGONAMI: tsuba with native subjects, of asymmetrical proportions. KAJI: a smith. KAKIHAN (or kao): personal carved cipher following the name. KANTON: tsuba with Chinese style designs, of symmetrical proportions. KAO (or kakihan): personal carved cipher following the name. KATANA: long sword of pair, worn edge up (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). KATANA MEI: signature on the omote side for a katana (see Mei (Signature) above). KAWAZUKO-CHOJI: tadpole shaped choji. KEN: an ancient, straight, double-edged sword (see Blade Shapes above for other shapes). KINKO: "gold workers," artists who made decorative fittings in Edo period. KINSUJI: short curved shining line of martensite in the ha. KISSAKI: the point of the blade. KO: small - ko-ashi, ko-choji, etc. KOSHI-BI: short groove in waist of blade. KO-ZORI: small curvature (see Sori above). KOSHI-ZORI: large curvature with maximum deviation from straight line closer to the nakago than to the tip (see Sori above). KOZUKA: "small hilt," utility knife handle stored in pocket in sheath (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). KUICHIGAI-HI: groove of complex form. MARU: round (see Boshi Shapes above). MASA (masame): straight parallel grain (see Hada Patterns above). MASAME (masa): straight parallel grain (see Hada Patterns above). MATSUKAWA: hada like pine bark (see Hada Patterns above for other patterns). MEI: signature (see Mei (Signature) above). MEKUGI: pin that secures the handle to the blade (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). MEKUGI-ANA: holes in nakago for pin that secures the handle to the blade (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). MENUKI: metal ornaments on either side of the handle to improve grip (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). MIDARE: hamon that is irregular in shape (see Hamon Shapes above). MOKUME: hada like burl-grain-wood (see Hada Patterns above). MON: family or clan crest or symbol. MONOUCHI: approximately first 6 inches of blade from the point back. MOROHA ZUKURI: double edged blade form in tanto (see Blade Shapes above). MUNE: back of the blade. NAKAGO: tang of the blade (inside handle) (see Nakago and Nakago Tip Shapes above). NAMBAN: fittings which have foreign subjects, other than Korean and Chinese (which were not considered to be foreign). NANAKO: decoration of small raised dots on plate of fittings. NASHIJI HADA: fine grained hada like the skin of a pear (see Hada Patterns above for other patterns). NIE: bright particles of martensite like tiny mirrors in the steel (see Hada Patterns above). NIE SAKI: opening in the hamon like a tear. NIJUBA: double hamon (see Hamon Shapes above for other shapes). NIOI: martensite resembling a cloud (see Hada Patterns above). NOTARE: hamon of elongated undulations (see Hamon Shapes above). NUNOME: damascene inlay of sheet metal fastened to a cross-hatched ground. O: large - o-midare, o-choji, etc. OMOTE: front side of ... . On a sword, this is the side of the blade that is away from the body when it is worn. This means that the omote side on a tachi is opposite from that of other swords. The signature is on the omote (see Mei (Signature) above). ORIGAMI: certificate of authenticity. RENGE: lotus. SAHARI: alloy of copper-87%, tin-8.3%, lead-4.3%, katashirome-0.4%. SAN-JU-ROKU KASEN: 36 most renowned poets who lived before 11th century. SHAKUDO: alloy of nigurome (katashirome and copper) plus 6 to 7% gold. SHIBUICHI: alloy of copper-60% and silver-40%, to produce best grade. SHINOGI: ridge line in the flat of the blade, along its length. SHINOGI ZUKURI: blade form made of three planes (see Blade Shapes above). SHIRI (jiri): termination of tang (see Nakago and Nakago Tip Shapes above). SORI (zori): curve of the blade (see Sori above). SOYE-BI: small groove beside long groove. SUGUBA (suguha): straight hamon (see Hamon Shapes above). SUGUHA (suguba): straight hamon (see Hamon Shapes above). SU-KEN: single form of ken blade. SUNAGASHI: nie like pebbles in bed of stream (see Hada Patterns above). SURIAGE: shorten. Swords were shortened by cutting off part of the nakago. TACHI: long sword, worn edge down (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). TACHI MEI: signature on the omote side for a tachi (see Mei (Signature) above). TAKE-NO-KO-ZORI: form of blade resembling a bamboo shoot (see Blade Shapes above for other shapes). TANAGO BARA: tang shape of belly of the tanago fish (see Nakago and Nakago Tip Shapes above). TANTO: very short sword (hunting knife size). Term includes several shapes. (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). TOGARE: pointed configurations in hamon (see Hamon Shapes above). TORI-ZORI: large curvature with maximum deviation from straight line near the center (see Sori above). TSUBA: metal plate mounted on sword between handle and blade (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). TSUKA: handle (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). TSURE-BI: small groove following upturn of point on long groove. UBU: original, unshortened tang. U-NOKUBI ZUKURI: form of blade shaped as head of cormorant (see Blade Shapes above). URA: back side of ... . The other side from omote (see omote above). UTSURI: faint misty pattern in ji. UTSUMUKU: straightening of the blade toward the point. WAKIZASHI: short sword of pair, worn edge up (see Types of Swords above for illustrations). YAKI: hardened steel - tobiyaki, etc. YAKIBA: hardened steel of the edge. YAMAGANE: "mountain metal," unrefined natural copper as taken from the ground. YAKIDASHI: straightening of hamon close to the tang. YAKIZUMI: boshi without turn-back (see Boshi Shapes above). YO: detached ashi resembling a dot in the hamon. YUBASHIRI: cluster of nie in ji. ZANGURI: texture of steel resembling a pear cut across the grain. ZORI (sori): curve of the blade (see Sori above). |
Return to the Table of Contents
Berger, Dr. Karl. Japanske Svaerdprydelser. Hugo Halberstadts Samling af-Skaenket det danske Kunstindustrimuseum. Copenhagen, 1963. (Small catalogue of one of the best collections outside Japan.)
Furukawa Toranosuke. The Furukawa-Wada Collection of Swordmounts. Tokyo, 1913. (One of the finest collections in Japan.)
Hara, Shinkichi. Die Meister der Japanischen Schwertzieraten, with Anhang. Hamburg, 1931. (Lists about 3,000 of the 10,000 known artists.)
Homma Junji. Masterworks of Japanese Swords by Masamune and His School. Tokyo, 1961. (Partial English text.)
Homma Junji. Masterpieces of Japanese Swordguards. Tokyo, 1952.
Joly, H. L. Legend in Japanese Art. London, New York, 1908.
Joly, H. L. Japanese Swordmounts in the J. C. Hawkshaw Coll. London, 1910.
Joly, H. L. Japanese Swordfittings in the G. H. Naunton Coll. London, 1912.
Joly, H. L. W. L. Behrens Collection Catalogue. Part III. London, 1913-14.
Joly, H. L. Shosankenshu. London, 1963. (The recorded Kao are valuable.)
Kozan Sakakibara, revised and edited by H. Russell Robinson. The Manufacture of Armour and Helmets in 16th cent. Japan. London, 1963.
Mosle, A. G. The Alexander G. Mosle Collection. 2 volumes and supplement, with 2 portfolios of plates. Leipzig, 1932.
Robinson, B. W. A Primer of Japanese Sword Blades. London, 1956.
Robinson, B. W. The Arts of the Japanese Sword. London, 1961. (The most recent work in English on both blades and fittings.)
van Daalen, Jr., J. Japanese Swordfurniture Collection of the Late General J. C. Pabst. The Hague, 1956. (Technical data & bibliography.)
Vauntier, P. Japanische Schwertzierten der Sammlung G. Oeder. Berlin, about 1920. (One of the best collections in the West, now lost.)
Yumoto, John M. The Samurai Sword, a Handbook. Chs. E. Tuttle Co., 1958.
REFERENCES WITH JAPANESE TEXT
Fujishiro Yoshio. Nihon Toko Jiten (Koto & Shinto Hen). Tokyo, 1939. (Accurate reproductions of signatures of swordsmiths.)
Homma Junji. Nihon Koto Shi. Tokyo, 1958. (A study of blades prior to 1600.)
Homma Junji. Nihon Meito Zukan. Tokyo, 1963. (Famous blades of the ages.)
Honnami Koson. Nihon-to no Jokoto Tokuchi. Tokyo, 1955-61. (Treatise on all aspects of the history and appraisal of blades.)
Horikawa Kunihiro Toso no Deshi. Tokyo, 1962. (Photographs and descriptions of swords made by Kunihiro and his students.)
Juyo Token Nado Zufu. Published by the Nihon Token Hozon Kyokai. Issued periodically, volume I, 1958, volume XI, 1963. To be continued as new authentications appear and are compiled.)
Kawaguchi Noboru. Tsuba Taikan. Tokyo, 1935. (Compiled from exhibition held 1934.)
Kawaguchi Noboru. Kinko Soran. Tokyo, 1959. (List of about 6,000 artists.)
Kuwabara Yojiro. Nihon Soken Kinko Shi. Tokyo, 1941. (Best work on soft metal workers.)
Remei Kai Meito Zuroku. Tokyo, 1960. (Swords of the Tokugawa collection.)
Shimizu Fudaku. Ko-Kon Kinko Zenshu. Tokyo, 1959. (List of artists.)
Shimizu Fudaku. Tosho Zenshu. Tokyo, 1963. 2 Volumes. (Lists of swordsmiths with information on styles and relative value given.)
Torigoye, Dr. Kazutaro. Tsuba Geijutsu Ko (Aesthetic study of tsuba). Okayama, 1960. (New research and study on tsuba. English ed. proposed.)
Tsunehira, Okochi and Shibata Mitsuo. Shumi no Nihon To. Tokyo, 1963. (A study of the forging, appraisal and handling of the sword.)
Return to the Table of Contents
Paul Allman | Muneto Maruyama | |||
Akira Asakura | John T. McCrosson | |||
Joseph Bott Founding Member |
Fritz Miller | |||
Boston Museum of Fine Arts | Charles Mitchell | |||
Avery Brundage | Robert Moes (Tokyo) | |||
Hans Conried Founding Member |
Gaylord Moss | |||
Charles Cowdrey | Tetsuo Nomiyama | |||
Bernie Craig Founding Member |
Robert Otoi | |||
Jack A. Decker | Jack Paras | |||
Dr. V. A. de Mignard | Lilla Perry | |||
Paul Dinant Founding Member |
Harry E. Pincus | |||
Milton Donals | Jack Rains | |||
Bert Elkind | B. W. Robinson (London) | |||
Elton Ericson | Dr. Nathan Rosenbloom | |||
Elaine Ericson | Royal Ontario Museum (Toronto) | |||
Ed Hamilton Falk | Bert Sherman | |||
Field Marshall Sir Francis Festing (G.B.) | Donald Sonderling
|
|||
Fujimura Kunitoshi (Iwakuni) Swordsmith |
Donald Stoehr
|
|||
Victor Goldis | Sam Takechi | |||
John Harding (London) | Robert Takata | |||
Dr. Vance C. Hall | Togo Tanaka | |||
Colonel Dean Hartley President |
Dr. Kazutaro Torigoye (Okayama)
|
|||
Dean S Hartley III | Toshimitsu Imaizumi (Osafune) Swordsmith
|
|||
Charles I. Haughton | Victoria & Albert Museum (London)
|
|||
W. M. Hawley Founding Member |
George Vitt Founding Member
|
|||
Robert E. Haynes Founding Member |
Robert Wainwright Founding Member |
|||
Yashitaka Higashi | Hubert H. Weiser | |||
Frank Ikeda | Joseph Wernig | |||
E. I. Itani | Robert Wright | |||
F. K. Kageyama | Robert Yamaguchi | |||
Yasu Kizu | Walter Yamaguchi | |||
Richard Knight | Keichi Yamashita
|
|||
Walther G. von Krenner | John Yumoto
|
|||
Frederick C. Martin Founding Member Past President |
Zenon Ziolkowski |
Nanka To-Ken Kai Presidents
Jean Paul J. Peutet
Frederick C. Martin
Dean S. Hartley, Jr.
Robert Wainwright
John Grimmitt
Daniel Furuya
Jim Kurrasch
Richard Suran
Return to the Table of Contents
SAMUEL WM. YORTYMayor LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL |
L. E. Timberlake, President Ernani Bernardi James Harvey Brown John S. Gibson, Jr. John C. Holland Billy G. Mills James B. Potter, Jr. |
Rosalind Wiener Wyman, Vice-President |
Thomas D. Sheppard
|
MUNICIPAL ART COMMISSION |
Paul R. Williams, President Eddy S. Feldman |
Ward S. Keller, Vice-President |
Ludlow Flower, Jr.
|
MUNICIPAL ART DEPARTMENT |
Kenneth Ross, General Manager |
Curt Opliger, Art Coordinator |
MUNICIPAL ART PATRONS |
Mrs. Homer Toberman, President Richard Livingston, Vice-President Ralph J. Eubank, Secretary Theodore Braun Mrs. Thomas H. Crawford Mrs. Joseph Harper Edwin Janss, Jr. Bernard Kotkin John Mock Walter Van de Camp |
Joseph Lipman, Vice-President |
Mrs. Samuel Wm. Yorty
|
Additional pictures from the exhibit.
Related links:
Website created by Dean S. Hartley III.